Elections, information aggregation, and strategic voting

Perspective Elections, information aggregation, and strategic voting

Elections have two distinct roles in society. First, they serve as a mechanism to decide policies when individuals disagree about appropriate actions. Second, they aggregate information dispersed in the population. This second role can be found even in situations where all individuals agree on the appropriate policies. The focus of this essay is on information aggregation in elections and on th...

Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections With Private Information

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive o...

Strategic Voting In British Elections

Strategic Voting In British Elections In this paper we examine the extent to which voters engage in strategic behavior. Our contribution is accounting for the context in which voters have the opportunity to behave in a strategic fashion. We also demonstrate that previous measures of strategic voting significantly underestimated the willingness of voters to engage in strategic behavior when pres...

Information Aggregation and Strategic Abstention in Large Laboratory Elections

Recent advances in voting theory have shed light on the influence of pivotality on voter choices when voters have asymmetric private information, and the implications of this for information aggregation in committees and elections. Of particular interest is the result that voters may optimally choose to vote contrary to their own private information, even in committees or elections where all vo...

Strategic Non-Voting in European Parliament Elections